I adopted a new cichlid today... the dreaded OB Peacock! 
Yes I know it's a man-made hybrid that doesn't exist in the wild. Yes I know a segment of the fish keeping community finds all hybrids abhorent. I also know that there are others here who have them or at least accept them as a legitamate fish in the hobby. So where do you stand?
For the record, I absolutely have no intention of restarting the neverending hybrid battle. If the mods are concerned that this thread may be going in that direction, they can scuttle it with my blessing. I'm simply asking about one specific variety (I hesitate to say "species" in this case) of cichlid that is openly sold as what it is: The ubiquitous OB Peacock. Without going off on the tangent of a muddied gene pool due to inadvertently crossbred fish that are distributed either maliciously or just ignorantly, I'd love to hear your thoughts.
EDIT: MODS... I DON'T KNOW WHAT I WAS THINKING! I PUT THIS IN THE WRONG FORUM. PLEASE MOVE TO LAKE MALAWI SPECIES. THANKS.
Yes I know it's a man-made hybrid that doesn't exist in the wild. Yes I know a segment of the fish keeping community finds all hybrids abhorent. I also know that there are others here who have them or at least accept them as a legitamate fish in the hobby. So where do you stand?
For the record, I absolutely have no intention of restarting the neverending hybrid battle. If the mods are concerned that this thread may be going in that direction, they can scuttle it with my blessing. I'm simply asking about one specific variety (I hesitate to say "species" in this case) of cichlid that is openly sold as what it is: The ubiquitous OB Peacock. Without going off on the tangent of a muddied gene pool due to inadvertently crossbred fish that are distributed either maliciously or just ignorantly, I'd love to hear your thoughts.
EDIT: MODS... I DON'T KNOW WHAT I WAS THINKING! I PUT THIS IN THE WRONG FORUM. PLEASE MOVE TO LAKE MALAWI SPECIES. THANKS.