african cichlid
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
Joined
·
2,304 Posts
Looks like a sunfish to me.
G
Guest
·looks like a hybrid between a blood jewel and a mbuna to me
Joined
·
705 Posts
i second the sunfish. looks a lot like a pumpkinseed sunfish. used to go out and catch em a lot in the summer.
Joined
·
6,748 Posts
Hard to tell species with sunfish so many are hybrids, most familiar hybrids are bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) x green sunfish (L. cyanellus) and bluegill x redear sunfish (L. microlophus) crosses. These hybrids occur naturally where both species occupy the same habitat, and they are produced by some hatcheries.
But yep I would guess it has at least some Pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus) in it.
All the best James
But yep I would guess it has at least some Pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus) in it.
All the best James
Joined
·
912 Posts
It's a pure Green Sunfish, Lepomis cyanellus. They vary a bit over their range, which is quite large. No Punkinseed in it at all.
I was collecting these before I even had an aquarium. Kept them in all kinds of tubs and miscellaneous junk containers.
I was collecting these before I even had an aquarium. Kept them in all kinds of tubs and miscellaneous junk containers.
Joined
·
6,748 Posts
Need a better pic to be sure surely.
I thought it looked a lot like this
http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=h ... 83&bih=413
Mouth not big enough for a pure Green Sunfish, Lepomis cyanellus?
http://gallery.nanfa.org/v/members/Nate ... e/Lepomis/
The idea that these Sunfish hybridise rather than vary across there range (and esp in man made habbitats) is not new.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article ... df/237.pdf
Just to add to the confusion....
"â€Å"a number of different kinds of hybrid sunfishes . . are not sterile, are fully capable of producing abundant
F2 and Fs generations, and can be successfully backcrossed to parent species and even outcrossed to nonparental speciesâ€Â
I thought it looked a lot like this
http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=h ... 83&bih=413
Mouth not big enough for a pure Green Sunfish, Lepomis cyanellus?
http://gallery.nanfa.org/v/members/Nate ... e/Lepomis/
The idea that these Sunfish hybridise rather than vary across there range (and esp in man made habbitats) is not new.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article ... df/237.pdf
Just to add to the confusion....
"â€Å"a number of different kinds of hybrid sunfishes . . are not sterile, are fully capable of producing abundant
F2 and Fs generations, and can be successfully backcrossed to parent species and even outcrossed to nonparental speciesâ€Â
Joined
·
912 Posts
Let's start with the fact that that paper is from 1984, and even that only claims a 2% probability of F1 hybridization within two measured environments in Georgia. I think the word is "insignificant", and they used it, not me.
The Lepomis cyanellus picture on the NANFA site has a white background, making it impossible to see the white edges on the fins. This is a purely cyanellus characteristic. The photo of a macrochirus x cyanellus is mislabeled, it is macrochirus x gibbosus. You will note that the hybrid gibbosus x cyanellus shows the bright pumpkin orange breast of gibbosus, OP's picture has no such color. This is not a variable character, it is one that always happens with hybrids between these species, both sexes.
The elongate body eliminates hybridization with macrochirus, gibbosus, and most of the other common Sunfish species. The listed species and most of the other common species have a deep body shape. The body shape of a hybrid would be more intermediate in height to length ratio, and it is not. The other elongate species, the Warmouth, has a bigger mouth than a green. The mouth is difficult to see in OP's photo, and does appear to be small. However, That could be deceptive, as the length of the mouth is concealed by a strong light reflection in the glass.
Since the OP is in California, the fish was either an introduced population or an accidental import from elsewhere. Since he mistook it for an African Cichlid, I'm guessing that he found it in a store. Therefore the source is indeterminable. That gives us, at WORST a 98% probability that it is a pure Lepomis cyanellus, thus my identification of a species that I've caught in 5 different states. How many have you caught near London, James? :roll:
The Lepomis cyanellus picture on the NANFA site has a white background, making it impossible to see the white edges on the fins. This is a purely cyanellus characteristic. The photo of a macrochirus x cyanellus is mislabeled, it is macrochirus x gibbosus. You will note that the hybrid gibbosus x cyanellus shows the bright pumpkin orange breast of gibbosus, OP's picture has no such color. This is not a variable character, it is one that always happens with hybrids between these species, both sexes.
The elongate body eliminates hybridization with macrochirus, gibbosus, and most of the other common Sunfish species. The listed species and most of the other common species have a deep body shape. The body shape of a hybrid would be more intermediate in height to length ratio, and it is not. The other elongate species, the Warmouth, has a bigger mouth than a green. The mouth is difficult to see in OP's photo, and does appear to be small. However, That could be deceptive, as the length of the mouth is concealed by a strong light reflection in the glass.
Since the OP is in California, the fish was either an introduced population or an accidental import from elsewhere. Since he mistook it for an African Cichlid, I'm guessing that he found it in a store. Therefore the source is indeterminable. That gives us, at WORST a 98% probability that it is a pure Lepomis cyanellus, thus my identification of a species that I've caught in 5 different states. How many have you caught near London, James? :roll:
Joined
·
6,748 Posts
I do not fish but sunfish (esp the smaller types) are quite a common ornamental pond fish here.
I guess I see too many hybrids? :wink:
I guess I see too many hybrids? :wink:
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
Join the discussion
